Legal Opinion
De Bruce v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 19, 1947No. Civil Action No. 5477PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
The most important question presented by these objections may be stated as follows: May the defendant in a negligence case, in answer to a written interrogatory under Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 33, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, be required as part of its answer to attach a copy of a witness’s signed statement^ taken by it immediately after the accident, the statement not having been taken by its attorney and not containing any matter of opinion or anything other than a factual account of the'accident?
The defendant contends that the decision of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Hickman v. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
- Nedimyer v. Pennsylvania R. R.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
3Cited by39 opinions
- Sierra Berdecía v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1959
- Southern Railway Company v. Carl Talmadge LanhamCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Alltmont v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Daniel J. McDougall Jr. v. Kenneth R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Rakes v. FulcherSupreme Court of Virginia · 1970
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.