Legal Opinion
City of Malibu v. California Coastal Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 23, 2004No. B168229PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUBIN, Acting P. J.
The City of Malibu appeals from several orders thwarting its escape from the California Coastal Commission’s “local coastal program” for the city. (Pub. Resources Code, § 30166.5.) We affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The City of Malibu (Malibu) lies in California’s coastal zone. Consequently, the California Coastal Act obligated Malibu to develop a “local coastal program” (LCP) to guide its development. (Pub. Resources Code, §§ 30108.6, 30500 et seq.) With an LCP in place, Malibu shoulders the burden of processing coastal development permits; otherwise, the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- DeVita v. County of NapaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Yost v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ross v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Trancas Property Owners Ass'n v. City of MalibuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Taxpayers for Livable Communities v. City of MalibuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Visher v. City of MalibuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Cal. Coastal Comm'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.