Legal Opinion
Visher v. City of Malibu
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 2005No. B173471PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
23 Cal.Rptr.3d 816 (2005)
126 Cal.App.4th 364
David VISHER et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents,
v.
CITY OF MALIBU, Defendant and Appellant.
No. B173471.
Court of Appeal, Second District, Division 8.
February 1, 2005.
Jenkins & Hogin, Christi Hogin, Manhattan Beach, and Gregg Kovacevich for Defendant and Appellant.
David Visher and Sandra Visher, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Respondents.
RUBIN, Acting P.J.
The City of Malibu appeals from the trial court's refusal to dismiss David and Sandra Visher's petition for writ of mandate as a "Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation." Malibu also appeals…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Navellier v. SlettenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Equilon Enterprises v. Consumer Cause, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2002
- Briggs v. Eden Council for Hope & OpportunityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- City of Cotati v. CashmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Wilcox v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Building a Better Redondo, Inc. v. City of Redondo BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Carpenter v. JACK IN THE BOX CORP.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- City of Riverside v. StansburyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Henne v. City of YakimaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013