Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McCulloch

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 21, 2008No. Misc. Docket (Subtitle AG) No. 3, Sept. Term, 2007PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Chief Judge.

Bar counsel, acting on behalf, and with the approval, of the petitioner, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, filed in this Court, pursuant to Maryland Rule 16-751, 1 a Petition For Disciplinary or Remedial Action, in which, consistent with complaints filed by Bar Counsel and one of her divorce clients, the respondent, Carol Long McCulloch, was charged with violations (some multiple) of various of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct, as adopted by Maryland Rule 16-812, namely, Rules 1.1, Competence, 2 1.2, Scope of Representation, 3 1.3, Diligence, 4 1.4,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SiskindCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MahoneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. De La PazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API