Glover v. Woodhaven Homes, Inc.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Donald L. Corbin, Justice.
This appeal raises an issue of first impression as to the date that interest begins to accrue on a judgment, following a remand and modification by an appellate court. Appellee Woodhaven Homes, Inc., asserts that the chancellor was correct in finding that the interest began to accrue on June 12, 1997, the date that the original judgment was entered. Appellants Ross and Debbie Glover contend that the relevant date is January 19, 2000, the date that the judgment was modified by the Arkansas Court of Appeals. Alternatively, Appellants argue that it is irrelevant when…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Dinkins v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Harris v. City of Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Stockton Theatres, Inc. v. PalermoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Forrest Construction, Inc. v. MilamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Snapp v. State Farm & Fire Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Hortica-Florists' Mutual Ins. v. Pittman Nursery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Morgan v. TurnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Ford Motor Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Jewell v. FletcherSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Johnson v. Cincinnati InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.