Legal Opinion
Cotten v. Fooks
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided September 27, 2001No. 01-82PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
Appellant Brad Cotten appeals the dismissal of his complaint and asserts two grounds for reversal: (1) the trial court clearly erred in dismissing his illegal-exaction lawsuit and denying the injunction on grounds of mootness, and (2) attorney fees should be allowed under these circumstances, where the City of Flaskell rescinded its policy of renting its equipment to individuals as a result of this litigation. We conclude that neither point warrants reversal, and we affirm.
At the time of the events that give rise to this appeal, Brad Cotten (Cotten) was an alderman of…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- City of Hot Springs v. CrevistonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Commercial Printing Co. v. RushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Ratliff v. MossSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
- Wilson v. Pulaski Ass'n of Classroom TeachersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Neal v. WilsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Hobbs v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Servewell Plumbing, LLC v. Summit Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
- Bob Fannon, Individually and as a City Councilman for the City of LaFollette v. City of LaFollotteTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Manila School District No. 15 v. WagnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- Worden v. KirchnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.