Legal Opinion

Engel v. Tate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1918No. Docket No. 74PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kent; Brown, J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Anna W. Engel against Walter F. Tate for breach of a land contract. There was judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The parties to this litigation entered into the following contract on the 26th day of July, 1915:

“Grand Rapids, Mich., 7/26/1915.
“This agreement made by and between Walter F. Tate, of the first part, and Mrs. A. W. Engel; of the second part, witnesseth:
“That the party of the first part agrees to sell and convey to party of the second part, all that piece or parcel of land, to wit, Lot number eleven (11), Block sixteen (16), Ellsworth Addition to city of Grand Rapids, with good title, and second party agrees to pay to first party the sum of fifteen hundred ($1,500) dollars for same, as…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. ZimmermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Smith v. MitchellMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Hutchinson v. PoyerMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Dyer v. RosenthalMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Barbrick v. White Sewing Machine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re State Highway CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  2. McCleneghan v. PowellNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Messer v. DornbosMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Gervickes v. Royal Exchange Assurance Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Murphy v. BonewellMichigan Supreme Court · 1922

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API