Legal Opinion

State v. Gietzen

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 2010No. 20090307PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Shane Gietzen appeals the district court’s order entering judgment on the jury’s verdict finding Gietzen guilty of driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or greater. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] On May 23, 2009, Gietzen was arrested in Bismarck, North Dakota for driving under the influence of alcohol with a blood-alcohol concentration of 0.08 percent or greater. Gietzen was stopped by North Dakota State Highway Trooper Jeremiah Bohn, who testified Gietzen smelled of alcohol, had watery and bloodshot eyes and failed the horizontal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Melendez-Diaz v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. United States v. Charles T. LottCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  4. State v. SchwalkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. HarmonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ZeiningerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  2. Derr v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. State ex rel. Roseland v. HeraufNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  4. State v. LutzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. StrohNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API