State v. Stroh
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Joshua Stroh appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion by deciding that the Intoxilyzer test had been fairly administered and by admitting the test result into evidence, we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On September 9, 2009, at 10:37 p.m., a state highway patrol officer observed a vehicle speeding and initiated a stop. Stroh was identified as the vehicle’s driver, and, noticing an odor of alcohol on Stroh’s breath, the officer administered field…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. JordheimNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Ringsaker v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. VogelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thorsrud v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. KellerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HirschkornNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- City of Dickinson v. SchankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- City of Lincoln v. JohnstonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.