Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Friedman

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1932No. Civil No. 3128PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

This is a consolidation of two cases tried in the superior court of Maricopa county. Sol M. Friedm and Leah Friedman, his wife, hereinafter called appellants, filed separate actions for damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained by them through the negligence of Bert L. Friedman, hereinafter called appellee, in an automobile accident which occurred on March 9, 1930, on the public highway in Imperial county, California, while they were riding as his guests. The two actions were consolidated for the purpose of trial, and, at the close of appellants’ case, appellee moved that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Dowd v. Atlas Taxicab & Auto Service Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Parmenter v. McDougallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Curran v. Earle C. Anthony, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miller v. StevensSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Pride v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Layman v. HeardOregon Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Renfro v. KeenCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935
  5. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Rumeh. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API