Legal Opinion

Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Rumeh. Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Rhodes

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1949No. 12237_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN,- Chief Judge.,

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of two of appellant’s paying passengers held to have been negligently injured while traveling in New Mexico in one of appellant’s busses running easterly on the highway from Las Cruces. Appellee Rumeh brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Appellee Rhodes filed her suit in the Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona, from which it was duly removed to the court below. The necessary diversities and amounts sought to be recovered exist for the federal jurisdiction. Apart from the questions of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clay v. Texas-Arizona Motor Freight, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Pettes v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bell v. Carter Tobacco Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Friedman v. FriedmanArizona Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Southern Pac. Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. Zellem v. HerringDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. Wilson v. Northland Greyhound Lines, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1958
  4. Hennessey v. Burlington Transp. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 1950
  5. Brownell v. Fred M. Manning, Inc.District Court, D. Montana · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API