United States v. Pearson
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Quinn, Chief Judge:
The accused contends enlisted personnel below the senior noncommis-sioned ranks were arbitrarily excluded from consideration for membership on courts-martial. The evidence shows that in submitting requests for prospective enlisted court members, the staff judge advocate asked only for persons in a grade senior to that of the accused. That limitation is authorized by Article 25 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 825. The affidavits of the persons who participated in the selection process indicate their only purpose in choosing their…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. DaigleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
- United States v. KempUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
- Herrod v. Convening AuthorityUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004