Legal Opinion

United States v. Pearson

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 18, 1964No. 17,664PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

The accused contends enlisted personnel below the senior noncommis-sioned ranks were arbitrarily excluded from consideration for membership on courts-martial. The evidence shows that in submitting requests for prospective enlisted court members, the staff judge advocate asked only for persons in a grade senior to that of the accused. That limitation is authorized by Article 25 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 825. The affidavits of the persons who participated in the selection process indicate their only purpose in choosing their…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DaigleUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  2. United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  3. United States v. KempUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1973
  4. Herrod v. Convening AuthorityUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
  5. United States v. DowtyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API