Legal Opinion

Matteson v. Thiel

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1931No. 22703. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

Mr. and Mrs. Matteson brought this action against Henry F. Thiel, M. D., for damages on account of alleged negligence in a surgical operation on Mrs. Matteson. She had an abdominal operation in 1915, and two others for the same trouble, one in 1922 and another in 1923. All of those operations were by surgeons other than the defendant. In June, 1927, the defendant operated on her for the same malady. After this operation, she suffered pain in her "lower left abdomen until June, 1929, when another surgeon removed a round, curved, surgeon’s needle from her lower left abdomen.

Defendant admitted…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Helland v. BridenstineWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Johnson v. J. C. HeitmanWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Firemen's Fund Insurance v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. McDonald v. McDougallWashington Supreme Court · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Smith v. RodeneWashington Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hall v. Corp. of Catholic ArchbishopWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  3. State v. StuddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  4. Clark v. Federal Motor Truck Sales Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Higley v. JeffreyWyoming Supreme Court · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API