Legal Opinion

Helland v. Bridenstine

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1909No. 8080PublishedCited by 39 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Rice, J., entered November 6, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, for $4,000, for personal injuries received through the malpractice of a physician.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The respondent, a widow, brought this action against the appellant, who was a physician and surgeon in active practice in the state of Washington, to recover for injuries received by her arising from alleged mal*472practice on the part of the appellant. The alleged malpractice consisted of the use in and on her genital organs of unclean and unsterilized instruments, whereby there was communicated to her a loathsome disease technically known as gonorrhea, from which she suffered great bodily pain and mental anguish to her damage in a large sum of money.

The appellant answered the complaint…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Niemyer v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Helman v. Sacred Heart HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Sheridan v. St. Luke's Regional Medical CenterIdaho Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Gerberg v. CrosbyWashington Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Patrick v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1913

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API