Legal Opinion

N. L. Pierce Nat. Detective Agency v. Pierce Detective Agency

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 24, 1928No. 7 Div. 751PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The bill is to enjoin alleged unfair competition in the use of a trade-name so similar to that of complainant as to lead to confusion and divert the good will of an established business to the profit of respondent, with consequent injury to the business of complainant.

About June 1, 1922, complainant, “N: L. Pierce National Detective Agency,” was incorporated with main office in the city of Birmingham. N. L. Pierce, who had some prior experience in that line of business, organized the corporation, and became chief stockholder and manager. So far as here involved, it may be regarded as his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Grand Lodge Knights of Pythias of North & South America v. Grand Lodge Knights of PythiasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  2. Yellow Cab Co. of San Diego v. SachsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Burns v. William J. Burns International Detective Agency, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  4. McVay & Son Seed Co. v. McVay Seed & Floral Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  5. Kyle v. Perfection Mattress Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Birmingham Broadcasting Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. Arthur Young, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1983
  3. Fuqua v. RobertsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  4. Stout v. LawsHawaii Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Williams v. WertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API