Legal Opinion

Birmingham Broadcasting Co. v. Bell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 1953No. 6 Div. 429PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Per curiam

This case comes here by appeal from a judgment rendered on verdict at law in favor of appellee. It was submitted to the jury on counts 1, 4, 5, 7 and 8. To all of them demurrer was overruled and that is the matter first to be considered.

Counsel for both sides seem to agree that count 1 is in assumpsit and that the other counts, supra, are in tort.

As to count 1, it is observed that it is not one of the common counts. It is a claim that defendant has unlawfully enriched himself at the expense of plaintiff, for which plaintiff claims a promise to pay implied by law, and it is expressed in…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Southern Ry. Co. v. DicksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
  3. Smith v. DossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. Best Park & Amusement Co. v. RollinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. MillonasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,189 First Virginia Bankshares v. Alan BensonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  2. Old Southern Life Insurance Company v. WoodallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Ex Parte LumpkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  4. Fairfield v. American Photocopy Equipment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Kennedy Elec. Co. v. Moore-Handley, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API