Legal Opinion
Yellow Cab Co. of San Diego v. Sachs
California Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1923No. L. A. No. 6970PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDS, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff in this action sought to have the defendants enjoined from the further use of a certain trade name and slogan in the city of San Diego, to the use of which the plaintiff claimed to be exclusively entitled. The trial court granted the defendants’ motion for a nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff’s case and thereupon ordered and entered its judgment in the defendants’ favor. It is from such judgment that this appeal has been taken.
The following are the facts educed at the trial and which for the purposes of this appeal are taken to be true. For several years…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Waltham Watch Co. v. United States Watch Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
- Newman v. . AlvordNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- Dunston v. Los Angeles Van & Storage Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Sartor v. SchadenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Eastern Outfitting Co. v. ManheimWashington Supreme Court · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Schwartz v. Slenderella Systems of California, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1954
- Saunders System Atlanta Co. v. Drive It Yourself Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Florence A. Pike v. Ruby Foo's Den, Inc., of Maryland, a CoprorationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
- Hoover Co. v. GrogerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Kay Jewelry Co. v. KapiloffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.