Legal Opinion
Stout v. Laws
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided August 12, 1946No. 2625PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OP THE COURT BY
PETERS, J.
This is a petition for a declaratory judgment.
Prom the allegations of the complaint it appears that on April 2,1945, the plaintiffs jointly purchased as a going concern the assets and good will of the roofing business then owned and operated by Howard W. Laws on'the cornel 1 of Ala Moana and Cooke St. in Honolulu, including the right to do business under the style of “Laws Roofing Company”; that they thereupon organized as a copartnership under the firm name and style of “Laws Roofing Company” but registration of the partnership in the office of the treasurer…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hanover Star Milling Co. v. MetcalfSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- American Steel Foundries v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Brown Chemical Co. v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Hall's Safe Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Eckard Brandes, Inc. v. RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Aku v. LewisHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
- Barranco v. 3D Sys. Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2018
- Admor HVAC Products, Inc. v. LessaryDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- Eckard Brandes, Inc., Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Randell A. Riley Lee T. Kunimitsu, Counter-Defendants-Appellants, and Kamaaina Pumping, a Hawaii General Partnership, Counter-Defendant. Eckard Brandes, Inc., Counter-Claimant-Appellee v. Randell A. Riley Lee T. Kunimitsu Kamaaina Pumping, a Hawaii General Partnership, Counter-Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003