Legal Opinion
Kim v. Michigan Ladder Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 10, 1962No. Civ. A. No. 18253PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARSH, District Judge.
At the trial of.this diversity action, the jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff, George F. Kim, and against the defendant, Michigan Ladder Company (Michigan), in the sum of $10,-000.00, and a verdict in favor of Michigan as third-party plaintiff and against Keystone Floors, Inc. (Keystone), Kim’s employer and the third-party defendant, for contribution to the extent allowed by law. Judgments were entered on the verdicts. Michigan paid Kim $9,975.00, and the judgment against it was satisfied.1 Michigan now moves the court to alter and amend the judgment for…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Fisher v. DiehlSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- PULLER (Et Al.) v. PullerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Socha v. MetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Nicholson Construction Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Newport Air Park, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1968
- Lee v. United States Plywood Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Banaschoski v. General Deliveries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- PA. NAT. MUT. CAS. INS. v. Nicholson Const.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.