Legal Opinion

Banaschoski v. General Deliveries, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 5, 1964No. Civ. A. No. 63-605PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARSH, District Judge.

In this diversity action based upon the alleged negligence of the original defendant in a vehicular mishap on the Pennsylvania Turnpike, said defendant has impleaded the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission for contribution. The plaintiff, an employee of the Commission, is alleged to have been injured in the accident while in the course of his employment. The Commission has now moved for dismissal of the impleader action on the ground that this court has no jurisdiction over it by reason of its sovereign immunity.

The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, in Rader v. Pennsylvania…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Maio v. FahsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Brown v. DickeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Kim v. Michigan Ladder Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. James Leo Harris, Jr. v. Pennsylvania Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API