Legal Opinion
Tate v. SCR Medical Transportation
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 28, 2015No. 15-1447PublishedCited by 311 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
John Tate filed this suit pro se, seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The suit charges the defendant(Tate’s former employer, a company engaged in providing non-emergency medical transportation for disabled persons and veterans) with having discriminated against him and then having retaliated against him for complaining about the discrimination. See 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e et seq. (Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964) and 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101 et seq. (Americans with Disabilities Act). The district judge dismissed the *345suit, without allowing the plaintiff to amend…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Norman Grayson v. Mayview State Hospital Allegheny County Jail Camp Hill Prison United States of America, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2002
- Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by311 opinions
- Felton v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Freeman v. Metro. Water Reclamation Dist. of Greater Chi.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- Patricia Clark v. Law Office of Terrence KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- Trina L. Carpenter v. PNC Bank, National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Students and Parents for Privacy v. Sch. Dirs. of Twp. High Sch. Dist. 211District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2019
306 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.