Legal Opinion
Harris v. Roderick
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 25, 1997No. Nos. 96-35780, 96-35781, 96-35782, 96-35783 and 96-35784PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
Kevin Harris brought a Bivens1 action against thirteen named federal law enforcement agents, as well as several unnamed individuals and the United States for then-actions at Ruby Ridge, Idaho during two days in August 1992. The individual defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, in part on the basis of qualified immunity. The district court granted the motion to dismiss in part, but denied the motion with respect to almost all of the Fourth Amendment claims. The defendants appeal the denial of qualified immunity with respect to the remaining claims, which constitute…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Kisela v. HughesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Robert Reese, Jr. v. County of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Moore v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Esau Awabdy v. City of Adelanto Scott Burnell Ted Hartz Richard Althouse, Michael Sakamoto, Does I-X, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.