Legal Opinion

Frink v. Taylor

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1930PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurk, J.

On this appeal there are fourteen specifications of error, but these involve two main questions only — the competency of testimony given by the defendant, and sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings.

Clara T. Taylor was the mother of the defendant. She'died in November, 1926. The administrator brings action to recover $500 and interest which he claims the decedent loaned to the defendant, and of which no part- has been paid except the sum of $100 in two payments óf $50 each. -The defendant alleges that this was money which belonged to him; that he had been in partnership with his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. McCarty's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
  2. Robertson v. O'NeillWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Fox v. Barrett's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Omlie v. O'TooleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  5. Taylor v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of GrossmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. O'CONNOR v. ImmeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Kunze v. StangNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Hughes v. WachterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Combs v. YoungeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API