Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Goodrich

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1897PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Appeal from McLennan. Tried below before Hon. Sam. B. Scott. [This ease was designated as one to be reported, but was inadvertently omitted from the proper volume.]

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER, Chief Justice.

This is an action by appellant, Taylor, against Judge Goodrich in damages for false imprisonment. A general demurrer was sustained to the petition, and, the appellant declining to amend, his case was dismissed, with judgment in favor of appellee that he go hence with his costs.

The petition alleges that the plaintiff was a practicing attorney and that the defendant, Goodrich, was the judge of the nineteenth Judicial District, embracing the county of McLennan, and then proceeds as follows

“That while defendant was acting as judge as aforesaid, and heretofore, to wit, on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Rains v. SimpsonTexas Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Cheadle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Crow v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Scott v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re NevittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
  2. James Oliver McAlester Et Ux. v. David H. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Ex Parte ClearCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. State ex rel. Rodd v. VerageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  5. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API