Legal Opinion

Sloan v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 12, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Long, J., at June Term, 1914, of Burxe.

1Per curiam

The defendant moves the Court to strike out the statement of case on appeal and to affirm the judgment upon the face of the record. The motion is allowed. The statement of the case on appeal is in no sense in compliance with the rules of this Court or with tbe provisions of the Eevisal, sec. 591.

Tbe statement served upon tbe appellee purports to be nothing more than a mere skeleton, and may be illustrated by the following extract:

This was a civil action, tried at June Term, 1914, of Burke Superior Court, before his Honor, B. F. Long, judge, and a jury. (The clerk will here copy the first…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Searcy v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Carter v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. North Carolina Bessemer Co. v. Piedmont Hardware Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  5. Layton v. . GodwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API