Legal Opinion

Layton v. . Godwin

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 24, 1923PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.

Plaintiff brings tbis suit to recover of tbe defendant tbe purchase price of certain lands, alleged to have been sold at public auction, and at which sale tbe defendant became tbe last and highest bidder. Recovery is resisted upon tbe ground that tbe contract is not in writing. Tbe court below was of opinion that certain letters, written by tbe defendant and in evidence on tbe trial, were sufficient to meet the requirements of tbe statute (O. S., 988), which provides: “All contracts to sell or convey any lands, ... or any interest in or concerning them, . . . shall be void unless said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Will of RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Hall v. Misenheimer.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Sloan v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rawls v. . LuptonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  2. Searcy v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  3. Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API