Legal Opinion

North Carolina Bessemer Co. v. Piedmont Hardware Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 24, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Civil actioN pending in tbe Superior Court of McDowell County, beard at chambers at Marion, 3 February, 1916, by Justice, J. From tbe order made tbe petitioners William Morrison and N. B. Mills and tbe defendant tbe Piedmont Hardware Company appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBkowN, J.

Tbe appellees move to dismiss tbe appeal upon tbe ground tbat only a “skeleton case on appeal” was served, and rely upon tbe ruling of this Court in Sloan v. Assurance Soc., 169 N. C., 257. In tbat case tbe appellee objected to tbe case on appeal as not being in tbe form required by law. Revisal, 591. The case as served was sent to this Court. Without such objection, not even by consent, would this Court act upon such a statement of a case as is shown in tbe record of tbe Sloan case. That case was tried by jury, and nothing was sent up to us except a skeleton with blanks tbat bad never been…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sloan v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Privette v. . AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  2. Bishop v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Wilson v. ChandlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Hall v. . RobinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
  5. Redding v. . DunnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API