Chozen Confections, Inc. v. . Johnson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.
Upon the facts appearing upon the face of the record, pertinent statutes and decisions of this Court indicate error in the order of the court below striking the statement of case on appeal as served by appellants. C. S., 643, 644; Hodges v. Lassiter, 94 N. C., 294; Transportation Co. v. Lumber Co., 168 N. C., 60, 84 S. E., 54; S. v. Moore, 210 N. C., 686, 188 S. E., 421.
The statute, C. S., 643, provides that appellant shall cause to be prepared a concise statement of case on appeal and prescribes what it shall embody, and that a copy shall be served on respondent, appellee, within time given…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. . MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Womble v. Moncure Mill & Gin Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Carter v. . BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- State v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Sloan v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- Searcy v. . LoganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- Lightner v. . BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- State v. EvansCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.