Legal Opinion
Adams v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided November 1, 1984No. Civ. 80-4161PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CALLISTER, Chief Judge.
Before the Court are the defendants’ motions for summary judgment based on the running of the statute of limitations and failure of a condition precedent to a wrongful death action. This is a wrongful death/products liability action brought by Mary G. Adams, Frankie Adams, and Fred M. Adams, the surviving widow and heirs of Frank H. Adams, deceased, against thirteen asbestos manufacturers. The plaintiffs’ complaint is premised upon the three basic products liability theories, breach of implied warranty, negligence, and strict liability in tort.…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Billings v. Sisters of Mercy of IdahoIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
- Twin Falls Clinic & Hospital Building Corp. v. HamillIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Larcher v. WanlessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Street v. Consumers Mining Corp.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1946
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
- Castorena v. General ElectricIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Jenkins v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1985
- Terry v. Tyler Pipe IndustriesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1986
- Adams v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Idaho · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.