Legal Opinion

Russell v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1992No. D-0489PublishedCited by 201 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HECHT, Justice.

If an individual’s action for personal injuries would have been barred by limitations *344at the time of his death, are actions based upon the same wrongful conduct, brought by his heirs, legal representatives or estate under the Survival Statute, Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code § 71.021, and by his beneficiaries under the Wrongful Death Statute, Tex. Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code §§ 71.001-011, also barred by limitations? Both the district court and the court of appeals answered this question affirmatively. 795 S.W.2d 243. We agree.

I

In 1981, Donnon Russell was diagnosed as suffering from…

2Cases cited99 opinions

  1. Moreno v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. VreelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Duhart v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Rose v. Doctors HospitalTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Gerald S. Slaughter, Roma S. Bates v. Southern Talc CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991

94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by201 opinions

  1. KPMG Peat Marwick v. Harrison County Housing Finance Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Horizon/CMS Healthcare Corporation v. AuldTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Austin Nursing Center, Inc. v. LovatoTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Childs v. HausseckerTexas Supreme Court · 1998

196 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API