Legal Opinion
In re Mark C.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 14, 1992No. 10774PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The respondent mother1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment terminating her parental rights pursuant to General Statutes § 17a-112 (b) (2) and (3).2 The respondent claims (1) that the trial court improperly took judicial notice of the findings from the earlier neglect proceedings in this case and (2) that the trial court’s decision was not supported by clear and convincing evidence as required by General Statutes § 17a-112. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts are relevant to this appeal. The respondent was the mother of Mark C., born March 31, 1983, and Amy C.,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Carpenter v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- State v. TomanelliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- In re Juvenile Appeal (84-AB)Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- In re Christine F.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. Napert-Boyer PartnershipConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
- Lowe v. LoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Hryniewicz v. WilsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- In re Donna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- In re Jah'za G.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.