People Ex Rel. Williamson v. Rinner
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.,
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. The action was in quo warranto to have it adjudged that defendants were usurping and improperly exercising the office of trustees of Courthouse School District in the county of Sonoma. This district was created by a special act of the legislature in 1878 (Stats. 1877-78, p. 752) and embraced what now constitutes the city of Santa Rosa and some adjacent territory outside the corporate limits thereof. In 1919 (Stats. 1919, p. 239) the legislature repealed the said act of 1878 creating said district. At the time of said repeal, and for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In re the Bonds of the Madera Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Kennedy v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Smith v. San Francisco & North Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1897
- Hancock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Attorney General ex rel. Kies v. LowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fitts v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. All Persons & PartiesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Ward v. San Diego School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Butler v. Compton Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Diaz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.