Legal Opinion

Alarid v. Gordon

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1931No. 3565PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

WATSON, J.

Socorro Alarid sued D. G. Gordon and the city of Santa Fe for negligence resulting in personal injuries. By trial amendment to the complaint, Ricardo Alarid, husband of Socorro Alarid, was joined as a party plaintiff. The cause was tried without a jury. From a substantial judgment for plaintiffs, defendants have appealed. We find it convenient to withdraw the original opinion.

Appellant Gordon was engaged in the construction of a sewer, under contract with appellant city. At the time in question the main sewer, in mid street, had been completed and the excavation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arnett v. ReadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Davis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Johnson v. City of Santa FeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Davis v. ChrispSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
  5. Boyd v. Buick Automobile Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Soto v. VandeventerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Williams v. City of HobbsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. WueschinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Atencio v. Espanola Housing AuthorityNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. WueschinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API