Legal Opinion

Davis v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. 5448PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Morris, J., entered June 3, 1904, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs after a trial before the court, a jury being waived, in an action for personal injuries sustained through a defect in a sidewalk.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the respondent Alice J. Davis, in falling on a defective sidewalk, on one of the public streets in the city of Seattle. The action was originally commenced by Alice J. Davis alone, her husband not being joined as a party. Trial was had by the court, a jury being waived. It did not appear on the face of the original complaint that respondent Alice J. Davis was a married woman, and no question of any defect of parties was raised by demurrer or answer, or in any manner prior to- the trial. Dpon the trial, however, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Born v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Hawkins v. Front Street Cable Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Allend v. Spokane Falls & Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Ehrhardt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Griswold v. City of LudingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1898

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Medina v. Public Utility Dist. No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Medina v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ostheller v. Spokane & Inland Empire RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Proctor v. ForsytheCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. Dohring v. Kansas City.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API