Atencio v. Espanola Housing Authority
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUTIN, Judge.
The only question for determination is whether § 23-1-23, N.M.S.A.1953 (Vol. 5), a limitation statute, is unconstitutional because it denied plaintiffs the equal protection of the law. We say that it is unconstitutional and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The statute reads in pertinent part as follows:
[N]o suit, action or proceeding to recover damages for personal injury or death resulting from the negligence of any city, town or village, or any officer thereof, shall be commenced except within one [1] year next after the date of such injury. All such suits,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hicks v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
- Gregg Dyeing Co. v. QuerySupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- McGeehan v. BunchNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Jenkins v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Gruschus Ex Rel. Estate of Adams v. Bureau of RevenueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Martinez v. City of ClovisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- Martinez v. City of ClovisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980