Legal Opinion

Continental Casualty Co. v. Wueschinski

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided March 5, 1981No. 4827PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Judge.

Continental (Continental Casualty Company), the workmen’s compensation insurer of the employer, paid compensation and medical benefits to Hess, the employee. The issue is the right of Continental to sue Wueschinski, the third party allegedly liable for the injuries to Hess, and because of which compensation and medical benefits were paid to Hess. Continental filed suit against defendant, naming Hess as an involuntary plaintiff. Hess did not wish to participate in the suit. The trial court ruled “that the involuntary plaintiff cannot be compelled to sue the defendant against…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Springer Corporation v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Transport Indemnity Company v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. White v. SutherlandNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Herrera v. Springer CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Varney v. TaylorNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Strickland v. Roosevelt County Rural Electric CooperativeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. American General Fire & Casualty Co. v. J.T. Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. WueschinskiNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API