Legal Opinion

Arnett v. Reade

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 3, 1911No. 98PublishedCited by 79 opinions

APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP NEW MEXICO. ■ The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes

This is a suit to quiet title brought by the appellee against the widow of Adolpho Lea, for whom her heirs were substituted.upon her decease. Adolpho. Lea married in 1857. He bought the land in question in 1889 and 1893 and it became community property. In 1902 he sold it to the appellee, shortly before his death in the same year, his wife not joining in the conveyance. By the laws of New Mexico of 1901, c. 62, § 6, (a) “neither husband nor wife shall convey, mortgage, incumber or dispose of any real estate or legal or equitable interest therein acquired during coverture by onerous title…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Warburton v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Randall v. KreigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. Garrozi v. DastasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Guice v. LawrenceSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Poe v. SeabornSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. United States v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Mutual Loan Co. v. MartellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Beals ex rel. Walker v. AresNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1919

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API