Legal Opinion
Lazarcheck v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 4, 1984No. (2095)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTesto, J.
This is an appeal 1 from a judgment of the Superior Court dismissing the plaintiffs appeal from a decision of the employment security board of review denying the plaintiff unemployment benefits. The plaintiff worked as an assembler for Veeder-Root Company from approximately 1980 until April 23,1981. During the course of this employment, she received some attendance and lateness warnings.
On April 23, 1981, Veeder-Root Company was purchased by the defendant G. General ElectroComponents (G. General) which became the plaintiffs new employer. On August 7,1981, the plaintiff left the factory for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robinson v. Unemployment Security Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Burnham v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Cervantes v. AdministratorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- DaSilva v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Hannon v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Superior Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rivera v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Todd v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Bailey v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Gruskin v. Administrator, Unemp. Comp., No. 51 62 49 (Feb. 26, 1993)Connecticut Superior Court · 1993
- Lehoux v. Administrator, No. Cv 95 0069891 (May 21, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996