People v. Driggs
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. George it. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, P. J.
Defendant was found guilty under an information charging her with the crime of forgery by willfully, unlawfully, falsely, fraudulently and feloniously making, forging and counterfeiting a certain lease, a copy of which is set forth; and, at a subsequent date, of uttering, publishing and passing as true the same, with full knowledge, etc. Prom the judgment pronounced, and from an order denying a new trial, this appeal is taken.
Defendant offered no evidence and the verdict was based upon that given on behalf of the people. It is insisted that the evidence is insufficient either to establish the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CrandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- People v. CainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
- Castor v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- People v. DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- People v. GeibelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Del Giorgio v. PowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
- State v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 1933
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.