Legal Opinion

People v. Driggs

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 17, 1909No. Crim. No. 141PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. George R. Davis, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from judgment of conviction and an order denying defendant's motion for a new trial.

By information filed by the district attorney the defendant was charged with the crime of forgery, it being averred that she forged the name of one John J. Charnock to an instrument which purported, in consideration of "past kindness and tender care bestowed upon him by the said Gertrude Driggs," to lease to her for a term of years certain real estate therein described.

Appellant attacks the information, claiming that it is defective in that it charges her with the commission of two offenses, namely,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. PowellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. De La Cuesta v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  4. People v. IrwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Roosa v. Boston Loan Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re HorowitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  4. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1947
  5. People v. DriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API