Legal Opinion

People v. Crandall

California Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1899No. Crim. No. 489PublishedCited by 33 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County and from an order denying a new trial. B. N. Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtVak Dyke, J.

The defendant was tried upon a charge of murder and convicted of manslaughter. He appeals from the judgment and from an order refusing a new trial.

The homicide was committed at Ballona, on a lagoon near the beach, between Santa Monica and Redondo, in the county of Los Angeles. The only defense urged was that the life of the deceased was taken by the defendant in necessary self-defense.

Some two weeks prior to the homicide defendant rented from Hoagland a cabin having but one room, not far from the ocean beach and near the cottage occupied by Hoagland and his partner, who were fishermen. Soon…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sharon v. Sharon, 11991 (Cal. 7-17-1889)California Supreme Court · 1889
  2. People v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. James v. JamesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. SweeneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. LoperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. BurkeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. State v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1914

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API