Legal Opinion
Bartlett v. Krause
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 13, 1988No. 13358PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
In this case, the plaintiff, Patricia Bartlett, was terminated as fire marshal of Redding Fire District No. 1 by the defendants, Herbert Krause, Hobart Pardee and Davis Bernhardt, the board of fire commissioners of that fire district. The plaintiff appealed to the Superior Court, which con-*353eluded that the defendants had acted illegally, arbitrarily and in abuse of their discretion. This appeal followed. We find no error.
Initially, several background circumstances should be set out. On January 14, 1986, the plaintiff was appointed by the defendants as fire marshal of Red-ding Fire District No.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Packer v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Case v. Shelby County Civil Service Merit BoardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2002
- Clisham v. Board of Police Commissioners of NaugatuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Fennell v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.