Legal Opinion
Beverly Enterprises, Inc. v. Herman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 26, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-2475 SSHPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, plaintiffs’ response, defendants’-reply, and both parties’ supplemental memoranda. Upon consideration of plaintiffs’ amended' complaint and the relevant pleadings, the Court grants defendants’ motion in part and denies it in part. “Findings of fact and conclusions of law are unnecessary on decisions' of motions under Rule 12 ” Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a); see also Summers v. Department of Justice, 140 F.3d 1077, 1079-80 (D.C.Cir.1998). Nonetheless, the Court sets forth its reasoning.
BACKGROUND 1
Th…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Alliance for Democracy v. Federal Election CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Jane Does I Through III v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Carroll v. EnglandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Totten v. NortonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Egilman v. Keller & Heckman, LLP.District Court, District of Columbia · 2005
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.