Legal Opinion
Totten v. Norton
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 21, 2006No. CIV.A. 04-2058(JDB)PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on plaintiff Gregory Totten’s complaint that he suffered a discriminatory reprisal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16, while working for the United States Department of the Interior. In addition to the reprisal claim, plaintiff contends that he is entitled to recover damages from the agency based on three tort theories: negligence, negligent supervision, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the claims or, in the alternative,…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Norden v. SamperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Prince v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Wilson v. U.S. Department of TransportationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Smalls v. EmanuelDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Gilliard v. Martin Gruenberg, Chairman, Fed. Deposit Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.