Legal Opinion
Pugh v. City of Des Moines
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided March 14, 1916PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Appeal from Polk District Court. — Hubert Utterback, Judge. Action to restrain the city from the enforcement of an ordinance prohibiting the standing of automobiles upon certain of the public streets of Des Moines. Decree for the plaintiff in the court below. Defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtGaynor, J.
The plaintiff filed the following petition, in which he made the city of Des Moines, the chief of police, the superintendent of public safety, and the police judge of the city, defendants. The petition is substantially as follows:
“Par. 1. The plaintiff is a resident of the city and brings this suit for the benefit of himself and other private automobile owners in said city.
“Par. 2. The defendant is a city of the first class, organized under Chapter 14-C of Title Y of the Supplement to the Code, 1913. •
*595“Par. 3. Section 30 of ordinance No. 1594 of said city, as amended, is as follows:
‘ Section…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Huston v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
- Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Chase v. City of OshkoshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
- Lacy v. City of OskaloosaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Vanderhurst v. TholckeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Foster's, Inc. v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
- Blumenthal v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Hickey v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1945
- Village of Wonewoc v. TaubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Lowell v. Pendleton Auto Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1927
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.