Lowell v. Pendleton Auto Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtEossman, J.
An appeal in an equity suit in this state is tried in the appellate court de novo: Morse v. Whitcomb, 54 Or. 412 (102 Pac. 788, 103 Pac. 775, 135 Am. St. Rep. 832). We have therefore read carefully all the testimony and have considered fully all of the exhibits. For us to set forth in these reports our comparison and consideration of the evidence would accomplish no permanent good. We shall therefore confine ourselves to the statement that we believe that a preponderance of the evidence supports the foregoing findings of the trial judge; he was able and bore a well-deserved reputation for…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Cohen v. . Mayor, Etc., of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Commonwealth v. ParksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
- Cadigan v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Strong v. SullivanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Palmer v. WaddellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Breinig v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
- Ex Parte DuncanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Birks v. East Side Transfer Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1952
- Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946
- Hickey v. RileyOregon Supreme Court · 1945
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.