Legal Opinion

Lacy v. City of Oskaloosa

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 2, 1909PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Mahaslca District Court.- — Hon. W. G. Clements, Judge. Action in equity to restrain the defendant city and its officers from removing certain hitching posts or racks which have been planted and maintained along the street lines bordering a public park. The petition was by the district court dismissed, and plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The site of the town of Oskaloosa was *706platted in the year 1844 by the commissioners of Mahaska County, who for that purpose made entry of the land, which was then a part of the public domain. The town was incorporated in the year 1853 and is now a city of about 12,000 inhabitants. Near the center of the tract there was platted a block of land designated as a “public square.” This - square constitutes a rectangle measuring two hundred and fifty-six and one-half feet on each side and is bounded by public streets each eighty feet in width. The county courthouse faces the square from the opposite…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Quinn v. BaageSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  3. Schopp v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Mayor of Columbus v. JaquesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1860
  5. Hobart v. Milwaukee City RailroadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. City of Emporia v. HumphreySupreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Kelroy v. City of Clear LakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Pugh v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Keyser v. City of BoiseIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Cowin v. City of WaterlooSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API