Legal Opinion

Hickey v. Riley

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1945PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHay, J.

In this action the plaintiff and appellant, James Hickey, sought, inter alia, a judicial declaration of the unconstitutionality of certain ordinances of the City of Portland, under which the city has caused meters to be installed for the regulation of the parking of automobiles. Plaintiff is the lessee of certain premises within the parking-meter area, wherein, for thirty years last past, he has done business as a dealer in sewing machines and other merchandise. Parking meters have been installed upon the street curb in front of his place of business, and others upon the curbs for more than a…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Cater v. Northwestern Telephone Exchange Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  2. Spicer v. Benefit Ass'n of Railway EmployeesOregon Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Opinion of the Justices to the Senate & the House of RepresentativesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  4. William Laubach & Sons v. EastonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  5. Bearce v. BassSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1896

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Automobile Club of Missouri v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. Johnston v. Boise CityIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Sandona v. City of Cle ElumWashington Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Morris v. City of SalemOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Rogue River Packing Corp. v. Department of RevenueOregon Tax Court · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API