Legal Opinion

Blaikie v. Lindsay

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

William C. Hecht, Jr., J.

The Condon-Wadlin Law (Civil Service Law, § 108) provides that no person holding a position by appointment or employment in the government of the city or any of its political subdivisions, or of a municipality, or in the public school service, “ or in the service of any authority, commission, or board ” “shall strike ” (subd. 2); a person violating the provisions of the section may be employed or re-employed; however, 1 ‘ his compensation shall in no event exceed that received by him immediately prior to the time of such violation,” and (presumably) “ shall not be…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Patsone v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  5. Miller v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1915

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Di Maggio v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Federated Homes, Inc. v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Di Maggio v. LindsayNew York Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API