People v. Stutz
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is a petition by Prank Mitchell and Jeanette Mitchell for a writ of supersedeas to stay, pending appeal, the execution of a judgment declaring that the use of the second, third and fourth stories of a building on Third Street, between Broadway and “C” Street in the city of San Diego, is dangerous to life and property, and that those portions of the building constitute a public nuisance, and ordering that all use of such portions of the building cease until major changes be made, including the removal of the fourth floor.
The building is owned by defendant Walter Stutz and petitioners are…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foster v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Clute v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Mark v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Feinberg v. One Doe Co.California Supreme Court · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Deepwell Homeowners'protective Assn. v. City Council of City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Sun-Maid Raisin Growers v. PaulCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Paramount Pictures Corp. v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964